Art theft mystery

The actor Max Nail had a party in his house in Hollywood last night. During the party, someone stole a picture in a large frame, but nobody saw anything. The painting was in a locked room and the door was still locked in the morning when Max went to get the painting. He was going to lend it to the Museum for a special exhibition next week.

Crime scene:

- room on first floor; all windows locked except one small one ( if the door was still locked in the morning then someone must have used that window to get in the room).

- small pieces of wood found near the window .

- muddy footprints (shoe size 36) between window and wall where the painting was standing ( size 36 shoes can fit children and the mud means that someone must have come from the garden and go to the room through the window).

Garden

- frame of the painting found in pieces at the bottom of the garden (perhaps the thief tried to get the painting out of that small window and therefore the frame broke)

- small, sharp knife found by dustbin

- footprints (shoe sizes 36 and 44) lead from lawn to road via dustbin ( so there were 2 thieves, the shoe sizes match a child and an adult).

Visitors in past week:

- Jake Silversmith, art expert, looked at the painting last week and offered to buy it - It can't be him because if he's an expert that means he has bought many other painting and has a lot of money to buy the picture.

- Justina Goodman, cousin and poor relation. Asked Max for money. - It is a little possible for her to be the one of the thieves but she is Max' cousin so there is no reason to steal a valuable painting just to get a few bucks.

- Frank Constance, neighbour, mid 60s, short and heavy (shoe size 41). Max owes him money. - There is no way an old man could have gone through the small window and the shoe size doesn't match so it can't be him.

- Dave Thorman, window cleaner and art enthusiast, came with daughter(14) - They must be the thieves! The girl could wear shoes size 36 and go through the window. Her father must have unlocked the window and since he likes painting he must have stolen the picture plus the 44 size shoes could fit him. Also Dave could've used the small knife to get the painting out of the frame. Everything matches!

Martin Uzunov

Art theft mystery

The actor Max Nail had a party in his house in Hollywood last night. During the party, someone stole a picture in a large frame, but nobody saw anything. The painting was in a locked room and the door was still locked this morning when Max went to get the painting. He was going to lend it to the Museum for a special exhibition next week.

The painting was on the first floor in room with all locked windows except a small one. Maybe the thief is small person or child who can get through the opened window. There were found small pieces of wood and muddy footprints (shoe size 36) near the window. At the botton of garden the policemans found frame of the painting. Small,
sharp knife was found by dustbit and there were found footprints (shoe size 36 and 44).

Visitors in past week:

-Jake Silverman-art expert, looked at the painting last week and offered Max to buy it
Jake Silverman can’t be the their because if he offer to buy the painting, he may have had money.

-Justina Goodman-cousin and poor relation who asked Max for money
Justina Goodman can have been the thief because she needs money and she can earn them from the painting.

-Frank Constance-neighbour, mid 60s, short and heavy (shoe size 41) Max owes him money
Frank Constance can’t have been thethief because he is fat and he can’t get trough the window

-Dave Thorman-window cleaner and art enthusiast, came with his daughter (14)
Dave Thorman and his daughter may be the thief because the crime was made by two. D. Thorman is haveing the keys of all rooms because he is a window cleaner. Heopened the small window and use his daughter to get in and to stole the painting. The muddy footprints (size 36) must have been hers and the footpints (size 44) must have been her fathers (Dave Thorman). So the thiefs are Dave Thorman and his daughter.

Art theft mystery !

Crime scene:
-room on first floor; all windows locked expert one small one
-small pieces of wood found near the window
-muddy footprints (shoe size 36) between window and wall where the painting was handing
Garden:
-frame of the painting found in pieces at the bottom of the garden
-small , sharp knife found by dustbin
-footprints (shoe size 36 and 44) lead from lawn to road via dustbin.
Visitors in past week:-
-Jake Silversmith , art expert , looked at the painting last week and offered to buy it. Jake Silversmith can`t have stolen the painting. He is art expert and it is possible to go into the room and stole the painting but the room was still locked this morning. So he is not the thief.
-Justin Goodman , cousin and poor relation. Asked Max for money.
Justin may have been the thief but he isn`t . He had asked Max for money but that don`t make Justin the thief. I haven`t evidences to prove that he is the thief.
-Frank Constance , neighbor , mid 60s , short and heavy (shoe size 41) Max owes him money. Frank could have been the thief but it`s possible not to be. He is Max`s neighbor. But he looks short and heavy and can`t have gone into the window.
-Dave Thorman , window cleaner and art enthusiast , came with daughter (14)Dave must have been the thief. He is window cleaner so he can repair windows. But the most important evidence is that he comes with his daughter (14).She may have gone thru the window and take the painting. Shoe size is also important. Children on age 14 usually buy shoes with number 36.
With these evidences I think the thief is Dave Thorman with help on his daughter.

Vaska Churkova

Art Theft Mystery

The actor Max Nail had a party in his house in Hollywood last night. During the party, someone stole a picture in a large frame, but nobody saw anything. The painting was in a locked room and the door was still locked this morning when Max went to get the painting. He was going to lend it to the Museum for a special exhibition next week.
The painting was in the room on the first floor. All windows were locked except one small window.So the thief can't have gone into the room throught the door and throught the small window. Near the window are found small pieces of wood. The pieces must have been from the frame of the picture. There were found muddy footprints (shoes size 36) between window and wall where the painting was hanging. So the thief must have been a child or a very thin person, who has got small legs.
There are another proofs, which are found in the garden. The frame of the paintng was found in pieces at the bottom of the garden. The thief might have been in hurry or the painting was so big so he/she decided to broke the frame of the painting to became smaller and to be transition easier throught the small window. Small,sharp knife was found by dustbin. Footprints (shoes sizes 36 and 44) were lead from lawn to road via dustin.

Jake Silversmith is an art expert, was looking at the painting last week and offered to buy it. The painting can't have been stolen from J.Silversmith, because he is a rich person and he can buy the picture. So the painting was stole by somebody else.

Justina Goodman is Max's cousin and poor relation. She asked Max for money. So J.Goodman could be the thief of the panting, because if she stole the painting and sell it for a large sum of money,she will receive money of which she needs. So she is one of the suspects.

Frank Constance is Max's neibourhood. He is mid 60s. He is shortand heavy(shoe size 41). Max owes his money. F.Constance can't be the thief, because his shoe size is 41 and because is heavy.So the person , who stole the painting is somebody else.

Dave Thorman is window cleaner and art enthusiast. He came with his daughter. She is at the age of fourteen. D.Thorman and his daughter(14) must have been the thiefs. There are proves:
-The crime was done by two.
-The window cleaner has the keys for all rooms.
-The shoes sizes 36 and 44 are of the father and of the daughter.
-The daughter can come into the room throught the small window.
So the thiefs are Dave Thorman and his daughter.

Art theft mystery

The actor Max Nail had a party in his house in Hollywood last night. During the party, someone stole a picture in a large frame, but nobody saw anything. The painting was in a locked room and the door was still locked this morning when Max went to get the painting. He was going to lend it to the Museum for a special exhibition next week.

Crime scene:
On the first floor all room's windows were locked exept
a small one. Maybe the thief is a child who can get through
the small window. There were found small pieces of wood
near the window and muddy footprint (size 36) between the
window and the wall where the painting was hanging.

Garden:
There were found the frame of the paining in pieces, a
small, sharp knife and two footprints (size 36 and 44).
S0 the thieves could be two.

Visitors:
*Jake Silversmith- looked at the painting last week
and offered to buy it. He can't be the thief because
he probably had money and he didn't need to stole
it.He isn't the thief.
*Justina Goodman- Max's cousin and poor relation.
Justina asked him for money. She might be the thief
because she hasn't got money but she needs it. If she
stole the paining and then sell it she can earn money.
She could be the thief.
*Frank Constance- Max's neighbour. He is in his
60s. Frank can't be the thief because he is old and
heavy so he isn't able to get in the room trough the
window. Hi isn't the thief.
*Dave Thorman-window cleaner and his daughter (14).
He came at the day of the crime. It was made by two.
Dave is a window cleaner so he had keys for the windows.
Before he went in the house with his daughter he probably
left the window opened. The footprint witch size is 36 must
be his daughter's and the others witch size is 44- his.
Dave and his daughter are the thieves.

{Art Theft Mystery}

The actor Max Nail had a party in his house in Holywood last night. During the party, someone stole a picture in a large frame, but nobody saw anything. The painting was in a locked room and the door was still locked this morning when Max went to get the painting. He was going to lend it to the Museum for a special exhibition next week.

The room was on the firs floor.There were some windows, but they ware locked except a small one, so the thief might have been thin to get in. There were found small pieses of wood near the window and muddy footprints (shoe size 36) between the window and the wall where was the painting haging, so the thief must have broken the frame which the paintig was in.

There was another proof that the thief have broken the frame, because it was found in pieces at the bottom of the garden and a small, sharp knife found by a dustbin.There were also found footprints (shoe size 36 and 44) witch lead from the lawn to the road via a distbin.

Jake Silversmith - art expert, was looking at the painting last week and offered Max to buy the painting, so it can't of been him because if he offered to buy it, might have had money.

Justina Goodman - Max's cousin, asked him for money. It could have been her because she can't have had money and I think that she had solen the picture to sell it and in this way to get money.

Frank Constance - Max's neighbour. Max owes him money. It can't of been him because he have got shoe size 41 and he is too old to get in the small window.

Dave Thorman - window cleaner and art enthusiast, came with his daughter(14) at the day of the crime. He must have got the windows keys and use his daughter to get in. She is 14, so the muddy footprints (size 36) must have been hers and the other footprint whith lead from the lawn to the road must have been her faters (Dave).

That tells us that it must have been Dave thorman with his daughter.

Made By: Aishe Uruch