Fame Results In A Loss Of Freedom

It is undoubtedly true that fame results in a loss of freedom. Some people argue that when you become famous you lose your freedom, while others claim that the freedom saves even the position of a personality. The question here is – do the fame people lose their freedom? When a person become famous, he/she sets aside for lose a part of his/her personality. He/she loses – friends, wins-betrayers and other important things. The luxury, the money and the wealth are for account of the loss of your family and your relatives.

Firstly many stars lose their freedom in the ambition to attract fans and to attract the attention. Secondly he/she is put under usual chase of the fans and photographs, who are trying to find something new about the famous people. Finally he/she loses the freedom to do what he/she wants. He/she is suppresses from all, who are observe and who are trying to find something new about star.

On the other hand a person can save the freedom and his/her personality independently of his/her material position. In addition when you change the way of your life does not mean that at all costs you change yourself, your habits and your behavior. Last of all when a star does not change his/her self, he/she is nearer to his/her fans.
That is the prize of the glory and the wealth. Some people lose their self blindness of the money.

Fame results in a loss of freedom

Fame can be defined as the determination
to be reach and happy. Some people argue
that without fame our life will be harder. On
the other hand others claim that with it our
life is not our. Evrybody will know your ege,
the colour of your eyes and hair. What you do
at 10:00 am. EVRYTHING.

What is true is that people who are famous
have a lot of freedom. Firs of all they can
travel really often. In addition they have
a lot of free time to care about themselves.
And finally, if they are famous they will be
invited at many parties so if they go that
means they are free to go.

On the other hand, it is abvious that fame
cant give you freedom. First of all if you are
famous all around you will have so many
paparazzi. That won't give you freedom.
Moreover, you will have lots of work to do.
For example, if you are a singer you will
have really busy life because of the many
concerts. And the last bun not least you
won't be free because there will be many
interviewers to take you an interview.

So to be famous won't give you a real freedom.

“Wealth doesnot bring us happiness”

We all can dafine the word “happiness’’ in different ways. Some people agrue, that without money you can’t be happy. But on the other hand, there are people who realise that we don’t need it, because there are more important things in our life.

What is true, is that people who are rich are happy as much, as the others are.Firstly, everyone of us had dreamed about wealth. But if we had it would we want it ?! Because with money you can buya house, but not – home. You can buy a doctor, but not- health. You can buy a clock, but not – time. So,the rich people don’ have freedom, because every their step is followed by papparazzi and medies and thay have been reconised everywhere. Moreover the rich people think how to sum up their money only.Like they live in another world, completely different of ours.

On the other hand the rich people have some freedom . Firstly, for them there isn’t door which is closed. In audition if it is closed they will open it again. Secondly,that kind of people can do what they want . That people can let their children go to qualitative schools and than universities.The rich people can make their dreams come true. They just secure their future, because they know that the money control the world.

So, we can’t say that the walth doesnot bring us happiness . It depends how we understand the word “ happiness”. And the real wealth comes when we are happy!

Aleksandra Koykova

“Fame results in a loss of freedom”

Famous people have good views, money, modern cars and beautiful houses, but do they have freedom?!

Some people agrue,that famous people don’t have freedom, because nobody respects their privacy. That kind of people are always followed by papparazzi and journalists. I audition they want to know everything- who they are dating with, what they are doing in their free time. When they did somethig, agter 30 minutes the whole world knows about it. Furthmore it affects their families and friends too. Their relatives suffer instead of them.

Finnaly they have no place to hide. Famous people have been reconised everywhere. And the whole world knows ans spys them every single second, just because of the fame.On the other hand there are people who think, that famous people have some kind of freedom. The well-known people have right to choose,because if they say something, the whole world will agree that, just because it is said by them.

The familiar people can go anywhere. They can”live on the moon” if they want. And there is no one and absolutely nothing which can put them off.That is another kind of freedom.
In conclusion we can say that the people, who are famous have some kind of freedom, but most of the time nobody respects their personal life.

Aleksandra Koykova

Fame results in a loss of freedom

Famous people are these people who we are looking everyday on TV , Internet , newspapers. Some people argue that fame brings free. However, others claim that If you are famous you lose your freedom.

What is true that famous people have a completely different way of life from ours. First of all, fame brings free. They can do everything: when they decide they can change their lives absolutely different. Furthermore, famous people earn a lot. For example, film stars take on a film millions of dollars. Because of that they have big houses and expensive cars. Lastly, stars can join in other causes. For example, Angelina Jolie join in some kind of charity causes.

On the other hand, it is also obvious that fame lose your freedom. The first and the most is that famous people haven`t personal lives. All the time they are in public eyes. They are followed by photographers, paparaci. Moreover, they can`t be themselves. When they give interview they have to talk to like to the other people. Last of all, yellow newspapers write lies about stars. For example, some actor took drugs or drunk last night in some disco etc.

To sum up, it can be argue that to be fame isn`t easy. To be stress all the time is not for everybody and isn`t such good idea. Nevertheless, fame gives you free to do what you want but on the other day all the world will understand.

Vaska Churkova

''Fame results in a loss of freedom''

Some people argue that fame gives freedom and the life of the famoust people must be diffrent from theirs ,while others claim that fame creates only problems....

It is undoubtely true that fame gives everything what a person needs.First of all it gives finantional support and lots of money.Secondly it gives you one of the peple's dreams - to trevel over the world and see sights whitch poor people can't imagine even.
Lastly you can meet famoust stars and have a lot of friends.

On the other hand, it's true that fame makes ''a barier to the world''... The first and the most important is that is that there's no social life... People people only want to be your friends for a personal welfare.Moreover,if the famoust person is very insolent he brokes his relationships,familyships and friendships.When you are alone you understand that you are in a deep water ,without anyone next to you.Last but not least is that your manager,or another person tells you what to wear,how to look,how to behave and etc.

It can be argued that fame is nice,fame is important but not only fame gives you the reasont for living,the reasont for living gives you those things which you lose when you are famoust....


Ivana Kalinkova

ESSAY Fame results in a loss of freedom

Fame results in a loss of freedom
True or False?

Fame can be defined as the popularity of a person. Some people argue that fame doesn’t take people’s freedom and you are not different from the others if you are famous. On the other hand others claim that with it, we have no private life.

What is true is that people who are famous have a completely different way of living from those who are not. Firstly, the famous people are wealthy and they can afford many things.Furthermore, these people care about their appearance looking because they are always photographed. So they keep fit and eat healthy food. Lastly, the famous people can live longer because of their healthy way of life.Nevertheless, it is also obvious that fame takes freedom. Famous people do not have private life. They are controlled by their image. They try to keep fit, to sport and keep their reputation but this needs so much time that they lose their own. Moreover, if they look bad they will be photographed again but this will ruin their image. If you are famous everybody would like an autograph from you. In the beginning you will feel happy but after some time you will think they are very annoying and stop giving autographs and you will be hated.In conclusion, it can be argued that fame could result affect freedom negatively. If fame is used unwisely it can take your life.

Geore Ovcharov