ESSAY Fame results in a loss of freedom

Fame results in a loss of freedom
True or False?

Fame can be defined as the popularity of a person. Some people argue that fame doesn’t take people’s freedom and you are not different from the others if you are famous. On the other hand others claim that with it, we have no private life.

What is true is that people who are famous have a completely different way of living from those who are not. Firstly, the famous people are wealthy and they can afford many things.Furthermore, these people care about their appearance looking because they are always photographed. So they keep fit and eat healthy food. Lastly, the famous people can live longer because of their healthy way of life.Nevertheless, it is also obvious that fame takes freedom. Famous people do not have private life. They are controlled by their image. They try to keep fit, to sport and keep their reputation but this needs so much time that they lose their own. Moreover, if they look bad they will be photographed again but this will ruin their image. If you are famous everybody would like an autograph from you. In the beginning you will feel happy but after some time you will think they are very annoying and stop giving autographs and you will be hated.In conclusion, it can be argued that fame could result affect freedom negatively. If fame is used unwisely it can take your life.

Geore Ovcharov